<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/" ><channel><title>Doodlen &#187; Seth Godin</title> <atom:link href="http://doodlen.com/tag/seth-godin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://doodlen.com</link> <description>Where Technology, Business and Society Intersect</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 03:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Broader Audience Less Satisfied with Kindle DX</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amazon Kindle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The New York Times Co]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/?p=159</guid> <description><![CDATA[Seth Godin points out flaws in a New York Times blog post about the Kindle - but the underlying message of the original article is interesting. <a href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 110px"><a title="Amazon's front door" href="http://flickr.com/photos/35034363287@N01/2265816229" target="_blank"><img title="Amazon Corporate Headquarters" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2371/2265816229_a7c158ec8a_t.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="67" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Amazon&#39;s Corporate Headquarters</p></div><p>Having spent some time recently <a title="Inverse Ratio of Inerest" href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/">praising Seth Godin&#8217;s writing</a>, I&#8217;ll take a moment to jump on the other side of the fence.  Today, he takes a moment to hold accountable Nick Bilton for a New York Times blog <a title="Amazon Working Backward" href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/12/learning-from-bad-graphs-and-weak-analysis.html">post about the Kindle</a>.  Seth rightly points out several issues with the author&#8217;s charts and underlying assumptions.</p><p>Bilton&#8217;s point is that through time, the number of customers who express dissatisfaction with the newer Kindles sold by Amazon is growing larger.  Seth&#8217;s perspective is that the market served by each Kindle has changed through time, progressing from technology early adopters to a more general market consumer.</p><p>I would argue that Bilton&#8217;s point is valid.  As Amazon attempts to grow the market served by the Kindle, they are struggling to maintain the customer satisfaction ratings they received with the early models (and original market).  Put another way, there is a mismatch between the Kindle DX and the market it is serving.</p><p>I&#8217;m speculating, but I would guess that Apple&#8217;s products do not receive a similarly large number of negative customer satisfaction responses.  Their products are well designed for the target market and the disconnect between what is delivered and what is expected is smaller than what we see with the Kindle DX.  Apple is the common exception to many rules, but it is possible to design a mass market product that appeals to both the technologists and the mass market.</p><p><a title="Shortlink" href="http://wp.me/shR8k-159">Shortlink</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Seth&#8217;s Inverse Ratio of Interest and Attention</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:14:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Site]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/?p=154</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have always enjoyed Seth Godin’s blog but until today I couldn’t objectively tell you why. I use Google’s Reader to consume RSS feeds from different sites. I’m not very disciplined about keeping the list empty – so now and &#8230; <a href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always enjoyed <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/">Seth Godin’s blog</a> but until today I couldn’t objectively tell you why.</p><p>I use Google’s <a title="Google Feed Reader" href="http://reader.google.com">Reader </a>to consume RSS feeds from different sites.  I’m not very disciplined about keeping the list empty – so now and then I take a deep dive and try to catch up*.  My practice is to flag items for follow up by ‘star’ interesting posts and then come back through later and post items to my <a href="http://delicious.com">Delicious</a> account.  For most feeds, I commonly flag one of every five or six items.</p><p>I just finished reading Seth Godin’s feed.  I reversed my normal ratio.  Pretty much everything he posts is thought provoking and requires follow up.  That should be the outcome everyone online should strive for &#8211; including myself.</p><p>PS:  I know this is pretty much universally considered a poor practice – but to date I haven’t been able to simply ‘mark as read’ an entire feed.  A weakness of mine.</p><p><a href="http://wp.me/phR8k-2u">Shortlink</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 1/25 queries in 0.045 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 328/385 objects using xcache
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cdn.doodlen.com

Served from: doodlen.com @ 2012-05-22 12:09:19 -->
