<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/" ><channel><title>Doodlen &#187; jus</title> <atom:link href="http://doodlen.com/author/jus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://doodlen.com</link> <description>Where Technology, Business and Society Intersect</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 03:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Google Productivity Suite</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2010/08/12/google-productivity-suite/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-productivity-suite</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2010/08/12/google-productivity-suite/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:04:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OmniFocus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[task management tool]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/?p=229</guid> <description><![CDATA[Google,s Gmail and Contacts are now top notch tools.  Too bad their Task tool didn't get a similar buffing.  My money is on that being there next frontier. <a href="http://doodlen.com/2010/08/12/google-productivity-suite/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has tipped it&#8217;s hand regarding it&#8217;s Office competitor.  This post on the Gmail Blog <a title="Update to Contacts in GMail" href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/updates-to-contacts-and-slightly-new.html">announces </a>that:</p><blockquote><p>Contacts now works more like the rest of Gmail, so if you know how to  use Gmail, now you should automatically feel comfortable in Contacts too</p></blockquote><p>It&#8217;s all good stuff, but improving the look and feel of Contacts (as well as Gmail itself) has brought even more light to the disparity that exists between mail, contacts and the Task functionality Google provides.  Keyboard shortcuts, configurable with tags on a full screen  &#8211; both GMail and Contacts look really good.  Tasks are still a little pop up with a beyond skinny interface and feature set.  It looks really bad in comparison.</p><p style="text-align: left;">In fact it looks so bad, I don&#8217;t believe for a moment that anyone at Google is happy with the red headed step child that pops up in the lower right corner.  When you consider the promise available with a tight integration with the other Google tools, the Task implementation is the biggest untapped opportunity they have.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn.doodlen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Google-Tasks-Pop-Up.jpg"></a></p><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cdn.doodlen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Google-Tasks-Pop-Up.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-233" title="Google Tasks Pop  Up" src="http://cdn.doodlen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Google-Tasks-Pop-Up-300x142.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="142" /></a></p><p>I&#8217;ve said it before, I would love to have a tight GTD oriented task management tool built in to Google that would compare favorably with OmniFocus.  They have everything in hand to produce a killer application.  I&#8217;m guessing it already sits on a desktop somewhere waiting for the blessing to be rolled out to the public.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2010/08/12/google-productivity-suite/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>So disappointing.  Google must&#8230;</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2010/03/02/so-disappointing-google-must/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=so-disappointing-google-must</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2010/03/02/so-disappointing-google-must/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:21:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Site]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/2010/03/02/so-disappointing-google-must/</guid> <description><![CDATA[So disappointing. Google must now retaliate and (as I have predicted elsewhere) buy Apple &#8211; http://ow.ly/1dsZq]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So disappointing.  Google must now retaliate and (as I have predicted elsewhere) buy Apple &#8211; <a href="http://ow.ly/1dsZq" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1dsZq</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2010/03/02/so-disappointing-google-must/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Fights the Good Fight v&#8230;</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2010/01/12/google-fights-the-good-fight-v/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-fights-the-good-fight-v</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2010/01/12/google-fights-the-good-fight-v/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:08:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Site]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/2010/01/12/google-fights-the-good-fight-v/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Google Fights the Good Fight versus China: http://ow.ly/VQc3]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Fights the Good Fight versus China: <a href="http://ow.ly/VQc3" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/VQc3</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2010/01/12/google-fights-the-good-fight-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>My New Year&#8217;s resolution is to&#8230;</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2010/01/04/my-new-years-resolution-is-to/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=my-new-years-resolution-is-to</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2010/01/04/my-new-years-resolution-is-to/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Microblog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/2010/01/04/my-new-years-resolution-is-to/</guid> <description><![CDATA[My New Year&#8217;s resolution is to re-invest myself in doodlen.com]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My New Year&#8217;s resolution is to re-invest myself in doodlen.com</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2010/01/04/my-new-years-resolution-is-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>First Impressions of Gist</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/30/first-impressions-of-gist/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=first-impressions-of-gist</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/30/first-impressions-of-gist/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Contact]]></category> <category><![CDATA[GiST]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Plaxo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/?p=175</guid> <description><![CDATA[Gist goes beyond aggregation to add value to contact information. <a href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/30/first-impressions-of-gist/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year I started casually using an online product called Gist.  My first impressions led me to put it in to the same category as Plaxo &#8211; but my recent experience has broadened my perspective:</p><p style="padding-left: 30px;">Yesterday, I added a friend to my contacts.  My friend, &#8220;Chris&#8221;, works as a building inspector for a nearby city.  The GMail account I was using is set up in Gist to receive updates &#8211; so a contact record for Chris was created.  One of the nagging problems with the Gist import is that it assumes that the domain name of the contact is the employer of the contact.  That&#8217;s not commonly the case for my friends &#8211; I&#8217;m using their personal mail account rather than their business account.  I went in to Gist and removed Time Warner (Road Runner) as the employer and entered the name of the local city.  Today, I realized that Gist had automatically created a company and had figured out the contact information for the city &#8211; automagically.</p><p>You can see where they are trying to go with the product.  The application aggregates mail and calendar events with content from a variety of social media sources.  Theoretically, you could use it to plan your day so that you are up to date on a contact&#8217;s correspondence across the broad spectrum of outlets available to people today.  It&#8217;s definitely a beta product &#8211; and one which will someday cost money to use &#8211; but I can see it carving a a unique position for itself in the marketplace.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/30/first-impressions-of-gist/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Bilton critique of Kindle (htt&#8230;</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/bilton-critique-of-kindle-htt/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bilton-critique-of-kindle-htt</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/bilton-critique-of-kindle-htt/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Microblog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/bilton-critique-of-kindle-htt/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Bilton critique of Kindle (http://bit.ly/4RGYD4) flawed, but makes a good point &#8211; http://bit.ly/6CzaLD]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bilton critique of Kindle (<a href="http://bit.ly/4RGYD4" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4RGYD4</a>) flawed, but makes a good point &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/6CzaLD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6CzaLD</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/bilton-critique-of-kindle-htt/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Godin believes NY Times Critiq&#8230;</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/godin-believes-ny-times-critiq/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=godin-believes-ny-times-critiq</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/godin-believes-ny-times-critiq/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Microblog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/godin-believes-ny-times-critiq/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Godin believes NY Times Critique of Kindle is flawed &#8211; http://bit.ly/8IthKF]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godin believes NY Times Critique of Kindle is flawed &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/8IthKF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8IthKF</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/godin-believes-ny-times-critiq/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Kindle DX Negative Responses G&#8230;</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/kindle-dx-negative-responses-g/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=kindle-dx-negative-responses-g</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/kindle-dx-negative-responses-g/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Site]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/kindle-dx-negative-responses-g/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Kindle DX Negative Responses Grow larger http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/is-amazon-working-backwards/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kindle DX Negative Responses Grow larger <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/is-amazon-working-backwards/" rel="nofollow">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/is-amazon-working-backwards/</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/kindle-dx-negative-responses-g/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Broader Audience Less Satisfied with Kindle DX</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amazon Kindle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The New York Times Co]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/?p=159</guid> <description><![CDATA[Seth Godin points out flaws in a New York Times blog post about the Kindle - but the underlying message of the original article is interesting. <a href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 110px"><a title="Amazon's front door" href="http://flickr.com/photos/35034363287@N01/2265816229" target="_blank"><img title="Amazon Corporate Headquarters" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2371/2265816229_a7c158ec8a_t.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="67" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Amazon&#39;s Corporate Headquarters</p></div><p>Having spent some time recently <a title="Inverse Ratio of Inerest" href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/">praising Seth Godin&#8217;s writing</a>, I&#8217;ll take a moment to jump on the other side of the fence.  Today, he takes a moment to hold accountable Nick Bilton for a New York Times blog <a title="Amazon Working Backward" href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/12/learning-from-bad-graphs-and-weak-analysis.html">post about the Kindle</a>.  Seth rightly points out several issues with the author&#8217;s charts and underlying assumptions.</p><p>Bilton&#8217;s point is that through time, the number of customers who express dissatisfaction with the newer Kindles sold by Amazon is growing larger.  Seth&#8217;s perspective is that the market served by each Kindle has changed through time, progressing from technology early adopters to a more general market consumer.</p><p>I would argue that Bilton&#8217;s point is valid.  As Amazon attempts to grow the market served by the Kindle, they are struggling to maintain the customer satisfaction ratings they received with the early models (and original market).  Put another way, there is a mismatch between the Kindle DX and the market it is serving.</p><p>I&#8217;m speculating, but I would guess that Apple&#8217;s products do not receive a similarly large number of negative customer satisfaction responses.  Their products are well designed for the target market and the disconnect between what is delivered and what is expected is smaller than what we see with the Kindle DX.  Apple is the common exception to many rules, but it is possible to design a mass market product that appeals to both the technologists and the mass market.</p><p><a title="Shortlink" href="http://wp.me/shR8k-159">Shortlink</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/26/broader-audience-less-satisfied-with-kindle-dx/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Seth&#8217;s Inverse Ratio of Interest and Attention</title><link>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention</link> <comments>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:14:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>jus</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Site]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodlen.com/?p=154</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have always enjoyed Seth Godin’s blog but until today I couldn’t objectively tell you why. I use Google’s Reader to consume RSS feeds from different sites. I’m not very disciplined about keeping the list empty – so now and &#8230; <a href="http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always enjoyed <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/">Seth Godin’s blog</a> but until today I couldn’t objectively tell you why.</p><p>I use Google’s <a title="Google Feed Reader" href="http://reader.google.com">Reader </a>to consume RSS feeds from different sites.  I’m not very disciplined about keeping the list empty – so now and then I take a deep dive and try to catch up*.  My practice is to flag items for follow up by ‘star’ interesting posts and then come back through later and post items to my <a href="http://delicious.com">Delicious</a> account.  For most feeds, I commonly flag one of every five or six items.</p><p>I just finished reading Seth Godin’s feed.  I reversed my normal ratio.  Pretty much everything he posts is thought provoking and requires follow up.  That should be the outcome everyone online should strive for &#8211; including myself.</p><p>PS:  I know this is pretty much universally considered a poor practice – but to date I haven’t been able to simply ‘mark as read’ an entire feed.  A weakness of mine.</p><p><a href="http://wp.me/phR8k-2u">Shortlink</a></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://doodlen.com/2009/12/22/seths-inverse-ratio-of-interest-and-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching using xcache
Object Caching 712/859 objects using xcache
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cdn.doodlen.com

Served from: doodlen.com @ 2012-02-06 07:31:21 -->
